I just use it to enhance the picture, not overdo it. ![]() I don't like the overdone pictures with either topaz detail or topaz adjust! Sliders can be combined, of course, in whatever ratio. Each slider can be either boosted or cut: a boost corresponds to an enhancement of a given band, a cut corresponds to a reduction. The intermediate bands work on intermediate scales. I Have to agree with you peano! I have much better results with topaz detail when you use it with cause! If you prefer: detail is on the left, shape is on the right. Any sentence, no matter how constructed, could be ![]() And this is consistent with best practices in post processing, regardless of what tools you are using. For a 95 chance at a Granny Hat, you need around 3000 rolls. The closer to the RAW stage you can apply DeNoise, the better. You can now explicitly turn each frequency into its own pixel layer (five of them are created in a stack, plus a base layer) for a better and more precise frequency based retouching. It's much like language: There's no such thing as a "good sentence" (nor a "bad sentence") in the abstract. Assuming the chances really are 1/1000, you need to roll 693 time to have a 50 chance of getting at least 1 Granny Hat. Wow Frequency Equalizer Pro Edition Adds to the classic features of Wow Classic the Decomposition button a new exciting feature. ![]() What is the image to be used for? If this were for a brochure promoting beach rental property - just as one example - this kind and level of enhancement would be perfectly appropriate. I don't think a picture can be judged over-processed (or under-processed, for that matter) without context. I was amazed and appalled when i checked out the Topaz site from the DPR news item about this new product. not trying to be rude or disrespectful, but they just look awful to me, like bad psychotropics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |